Pages

September 08, 2012

|Q|u|o|t|a|t|i|o|n| THE 100 SIMPLE SECRETS OF Happy Families ~ DAVID NIVEN




1.       Be a Good Friend
2.       Family Makes a New You
3.       Take Strength from Your Focus
4.       There are Second Chances
5.       Find a Community That Fits Your Family
6.       Believe in Yourself to Help Your Family
7.       Saying Nothing Says Something
8.       We Make Our Own Family Success
9.       Dedication Matters More than Occupation
10.   It’s OK to Be Right When Everyone Else Is Wrong
11.   Let Your Goals Live with You
12.   Tell Your Family Story
13.   Don’t Hide from Your Family
14.   You Define a Child Every Day
15.   Listen Without  Judgment
16.   Closeness Cannot Be Measured on a Map
17.   Live Your Views
18.   Parents Are Foundations Not Walls
19.   Make “Should” and “Want” the Same Thing
20.   Adjustments Never End
21.   Express Your Love
22.   The Bright Side Shines Through
23.   Forgiveness Depends on More Than the Apology
24.   Fatigue Is a Family  Enemy
25.   Jealousy Is Automatic
26.   Encourage Persistence Not Desperation
27.   It’s Better to Be Fair Than Right
28.   Every Number Has Challenges
29.   Think of Your Family When You Don’t Have To
30.   Don’t Let Negativity Build
31.   Recognise Pleasant Stress
32.   There’s No Price Tag on Family Life
33.   Calm Questions Get Answers
34.   Family Life Teaches Us About Relationships
35.   What You See Isn’t Always There
36.   Don’t Enter a Generational Competition
37.   Expectations  Must Fit the Person
38.   Don’t Obsess over Birth Order
39.   Show Up on Time
40.   Communication  Brings Us Closer
41.   Every Person Is in a Different Relationship
42.   Satisfaction Depends on Where You Look
43.   It’s Not a Popularity Contest
44.   Cherish Traditions
45.   Work on Your Own Terms
46.   Encourage, but Don’t Require, Activities
47.   Caregiving Is Personal
48.   You Can’t Be the Family Gatekeeper
49.   It Doesn’t Matter Who Earns the Money
50.   All Talk Is Not Equal
51.   What You Send Out Comes Back to You
52.   The Next Generation Will Define Family for Itself
53.   Share Your Struggles
54.   Beware of Clothing Disasters
55.   Competition Breeds Loss
56.   Do One Thing at a Time
57.   You Will See the Same Things Differently
58.   Strictness Can Last a Lifetime
59.   The In-Laws Are Not the Enemy
60.   Share the Housework
61.   Write Down Your Thoughts
62.   Pets Are Family Too
63.   Take Comfort from Routines
64.   Tempers Must Be Controlled
65.   Illness Can Have Multiple Victims
66.   Not Every Piece Will Fit
67.   Use Food Positively
68.   Self-Doubt Magnifies Family Problems
69.   Children Need More Than Parents
70.   Rigidity Isolates
71.   The More You Give, the More You Will Believe in Yourself
72.   Don’t Stay Together at All Costs
73.   Too Much Protection Is a Threat
74.   Experience Helps but Shouldn’t  Dictate
75.   Low Expectations Are Not a Family Solution
76.   Emotions Last Longer Than Events
77.   Even the Dependent Need Some Independence
78.   Another View Is a Strength, Not a Weakness
79.   Distress Is Contagious
80.   Family Affects All Aspects of Our Lives
81.   Generations to Come Make Us Feel Young Again
82.   Everybody Must Contribute to the Work of Family Life
83.   Be Real
84.   The Young and Old Want the Same Thing
85.   It Will Be a Family of the World
86.   The Most Important Inheritance Is Love
87.   Disagree with Each Other, Not Against Each Other
88.   Don’t  Do Everything Together
89.   Beware of Television Extremes
90.   See the Big Picture
91.   Give Yourself—Nothing Else Really Matters
92.   It’s Somewhere Between Easy and Impossible
93.   Everything Is Relative
94.   Make What’s Real into What’s Ideal
95.   It’s Always a Choice
96.   Everyone Is Equal but Different
97.   Continue
98.   We Seek Warmth
99.   Can You Do It? Ask Yourself
100.                        You Make Your Family


       -o0o-      
 
R e f e r e n c e :

DAVID NIVEN, Ph.D;  
'THE 100 SIMPLE SECRETS OF Happy Families --
What Scientists Have Learned and How You Can Use It’, Capstone Publishing Ltd, 2006:


   P h o t o : National Geographic

July 01, 2012

Handwriting Analysis: The Assessment of Graphology ~ E. A. Rundquist





This previously secret handwriting analysis document was produced for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) before being approved for release into the public domain through the CIA historical review program.





Two threads of argument run through the foregoing article on handwriting analysis. The first asserts the great need for research studies because "a proper test run has never been devised and carried out, at least not in the United States, to determine whether any graphologist can consistently deliver accurate results in the area of character delineation." The second asserts the value of graphology here and now as an assessment technique, making sweeping claims of what it can do. The arguments are essentially incompatible. If the claims are correct, the research is unnecessary; if there is no research evidence, the claims are unsupported. With the need for research to establish the value of graphology as an assessment technique I am in full agreement. I disagree with the claims for its current effectiveness.
The article makes a number of cogent points. It distinguishes between the well-established branch of graphology devoted to problems of personal identification and the branch devoted to character analysis; it stresses the need for research studies; it recognizes many of the pitfalls that need be avoided in carrying out such studies; it acknowledges that traditional psychological assessment is preferable to handwriting analysis when direct access to the individual is possible. With these points I am in general agreement. A little elaboration of all but the first, which is too well established to require comment, may be helpful.

Scope of Research

In evaluating graphology - or any other assessment technique - not just one, but many studies are required. Studies of agreement among graphologists, the development of objective techniques for measuring characteristics of handwriting, refinements in the methods used, hypotheses such as "small handwriting with closed and knotted o's and a's indicates secretiveness" - all these are useful and interesting, but they do not answer the main question: How well does it in fact predict behavior? Or in the terms psychologists like to use: What is its validity? Studies should therefore be concentrated in this area, a point I stress not in disagreement with Mr. Laycock, but because of its importance.
Validation studies in the area of personality assessment are not easy to do. There are many complicating factors - getting a representative sample of persons to participate, getting the same kind of information about each, getting information in sufficiently specific terms on the behavior one is trying to predict. This last problem is recognized by Mr. Laycock as a semantic one. "What is a brave man?" he asks. If there is no agreement on what a brave man is, there is obviously no means of checking on anyone's assertion that a person is brave.
...

Read more @


- Photo 1: National Geographic
- Photo 2: Striatic